CASE 3 ETHICS - Physical Privacy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

CASE 3 ETHICS - Physical Privacy - Essay ExampleUtilitarianism focuses on the consequences of actions, and the consequences of suspending these devil players are generally good, while Deontology understands that although people have rights to enhance themselves, they should do so within the move of law and integrity, to which they have duties of keeping. Utilitarians assert that an action is good, if it results to a net good for the greatest number of people, and barren penalties for artificially enhancing performance have widespread benefits to numerous stakeholders (Brooks & Dunn, 2010, p.183). First, the penalty respects the hard work of majority of athletes who do non use these enhancers. Using testosterone has been documented to have immediate physical and functioning set up on athletes, such as increased strength, agility, and speed (Lumpkin, Stoll, & Beller, 2012, p.154). Their former manager, Brian Cashman, says that he is not surprised that these athletes utilise tes tosterone. He said In Bartolos case, as well as he has done tolerate year as well through this year, at his age, after coming back from that surgery, makes you scratch your thinker (DelVecchio, 2012). As for Cabrera, Cashmans comments were When we traded him to Atlanta we had him as a low-end, everyday regular or an excellent 4th outfielder (DelVecchio, 2012). ... Sports must be about inborn abilities that are improved through regular practice, discipline, and other indispensable efforts. If everyone followed the same practice of using enhancers, people would no longer know if the performance they see is natural or a product of drug enhancement. The truth and reality of sports go forth be shattered. This means that using testosterone can have negative effects on the perceptions of both athletes and sports. The penalties are just because they ensure that athletes would not succumb to similar practices and that the sports industrys image will not be marred. With such a high pen alty, other athletes will be discouraged of using enhancers. They will know that the harms to their income and career will outweigh the benefits. Third, using these enhancers has side effects (Lumpkin et al., 2012, p.154). They can experience life-threatening problems such as peak psychoses, heart disease, liver and kidney damage, and cancer (Lumpkin et al., 2012, p.155). Other side effects are mood swings and uncontrollable pugnacity (Lumpkin et al., 2012, p.155). With these negative effects on athletes, it means that Cabrera and colon are harming themselves. If the youth follows their enhancement practices, they will to a fault be in peril. Thus, as role models who can detrimentally affect the sports industry and other athletes, Cabrera and Colon deserve a steep punishment. Deontology focuses on duty, not consequences, and Cabrera and Colon have duties to the sports industry, fellow athletes, and audience to follow rules and regulations (Ferrell et al., 2011, p.159). The sports industry has already banned the use of testosterone and other artificial enhancers because they are unethical. Cabrera and Colon are witting of these